The Meigs Distinguished Teaching Professorship recognizes excellence in instruction at the undergraduate and graduate levels. The Meigs Professorship communicates the University of Georgia’s commitment to excellence in teaching, the value placed on the learning experiences of our students and the centrality of instruction to the university’s mission. The award is named for Josiah Meigs, who presided over the university’s first class of graduates.

2023-2024 Recipients

Melisa Cahnmann-Taylor
Professor in the Department of Language and Literacy Education, Mary Frances Early College of Education

Tina D. Carpenter
Professor in the J.M. Tull School of Accounting, Terry College of Business

Erin Dolan
Professor in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Franklin College of Arts and Sciences

Keith Dougherty
Professor in the Department of Political Science, School of Public and International Affairs

Leslie Gordon Simons
Professor in the Department of Sociology, Franklin College of Arts and Sciences

Julie Stanton
Associate Professor in the Department of Cellular Biology, Franklin College of Arts and Sciences

The Award

Up to five Meigs Distinguished Teaching Professors will be named each year. The faculty so named shall receive a permanent salary increase of $6,000 beyond the raise provided through the normal allocation process at the college and departmental levels. In addition, the awardees shall receive a $1,000 discretionary fund for one year. Funds for the Meigs Professorships will come from the Office of the Provost.

Eligibility

The intent is to interpret distinguished teaching broadly to include, as noted below, significant contributions to graduate and/or undergraduate instruction. For this reason, no detailed format or set of criteria for nominations will be specified. Since the Meigs Professorship is designed to recognize continued quality instruction, nominations will be limited to individuals who have held tenure-track faculty positions for at least 10 years, with a preference for candidates who are full professors.

Selection Committee

Dossiers supporting the Meigs Professorship nominees will be forwarded to the Office of the Provost by the deans of the college and schools. Dossiers submitted to the Office of the Provost will be reviewed by the Meigs Professorship Selection Committee, a committee of eight faculty members, one undergraduate student and one graduate student. Faculty serving on the Meigs Professorship Selection Committee will serve staggered, two-year terms and will be chosen by the provost from nominations solicited from the deans and the Executive Committee of the Teaching Academy. The committee chair will be elected by the selection committee. The Meigs Professorship Selection Committee will forward their recommendations to the provost.

Process

Each college or school may put forward one nomination per year with the exceptions that the Franklin College of Arts and Sciences may forward six nominations per year and the colleges of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Business, Education and Veterinary Medicine may each forward two nominations per year.

No more than one professorship will be awarded in a single year to faculty nominated from a single department. Faculty who have won the Meigs Professorship are not eligible for re-nomination.

The mechanism by which nominees are selected within colleges / schools will be determined by the respective deans; however, the college/school selection process must: 1) allow the college’s faculty to submit nominations and 2) include a review of all nominees by a faculty committee. In addition, any department wishing to make a nomination for consideration by the college must have its own internally designated committee to advise the department head in selection of the faculty member to be nominated.

The nomination packed must not exceed 25 pages in its total length with one-inch margins and 12-point font. Nomination packets exceeding this length will not be considered. All pages must be numbered including the cover page. A nomination packet should include the following in a single PDF file:

  1. Cover page contatining nominee’s name, college / school and department (1 page)
  2. A written statement from the nominee’s dean (maximum 5 pages; see below)
  3. Nominee’s condensed curriculum vitae (maximum 5 pages)
  4. Supporting documentation such as course evaluation data, supporting letters from colleagues and students (or summaries or excerpts thereof), syllabi, etc. (see below)

The written statement must be prepared by the department head or dean. It should state clearly the candidate’s teaching load, past and present, and how it compares to the typical teaching load in the candidate’s department; it might also address the variety and levels of courses the candidate teaches. It must clearly and explicitly address each of the three following questions:

  1. How well does the nominee engage and stimulate students?
    This involves meeting responsibilities to students (e.g., well prepared for class, available for consultation, involved in undergraduate student tutorials, responsive to student questions and needs, provides clear instructions for assigned materials and assessments), and challenging students intellectually (e.g., stimulating ideas and interchange that provoke students to learn more, demanding quality performance in a responsible manner and causing students to rethink their values and epistemologies). Documentation might come, for example, in the form of carefully designed surveys of students, in-depth review with representative students, solicitation of testimony from successful former students and/or faculty evaluation of syllabi or other indicators of content organization and course objectives. These examples are intended to be illustrative, not prescriptive or exhaustive.
  2. How well is the nominee intellectually prepared for and dedicated to quality instruction?
    This can be addressed with information obtained from peers here and elsewhere. It might include, for example, instructional awards from professional societies or other groups, thoughtful observations from faculty colleagues about the nominee’s scholarly orientation to instruction, formal participation in the national organizations devoted to the improvement of instruction, or past departmental evaluations for promotions or raises. Here, again, these examples are only illustrative.
  3. What has the nominee contributed to the overall quality of education?
    There are myriad ways in which significant contributions can be made: principal role in major curricular reform, introduction of pedagogical methods (including computer-aided instruction) that have resulted in others improving instructional quality, publication of a highly valued and used textbook or other course materials, development of new or innovative courses that occupy a key role in the curriculum, evaluated contributions to (or research in) disciplinary pedagogy, or systematic mentoring of young faculty members or teaching assistants striving to become better instructors.

The supporting documentation should be judiciously assembled to include only essential materials. For example, a summary of a student survey might be included, though it is unnecessary to include each survey form. Similarly, reliance on course syllabi as indicators of content and objectives might necessitate the inclusion of a single syllabus rather than syllabi from all courses.

It cannot be expected that any one individual will excel in all of the ways mentioned. However, other than in extraordinary instances, excellence must be manifested with more than a single indicator. For example, a student survey may be relevant to the case and provide useful information. However, at best it is but one indicator of what it means to achieve distinction in instruction in the broad manner intended with the Meigs Professorship.

Submission of Nominations

Deans’ Offices should submit nomination packets as single PDFs (one PDF per nominee) through the school / college “course” site in eLC. The deadline is Wednesday, October 23, 2024.

Questions regarding the Meigs Professorship should be directed to:

Sherri Bennett
Office of the Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost
[email protected]
(706) 542-0383

Meigs Professors

Listed below are faculty members who have been named Meigs Distinguished Teaching Professors, the University’s highest honor for excellence in instruction.

2023-2024

Melisa Cahnmann-Taylor
Tina D. Carpenter
Erin Dolan
Keith Dougherty
Leslie Gordon Simons
Julie Stanton

2022-2023

Tessa Andrews
Sonia Hernandez
Maria Navarro
Kimberly Skobba

2021-2022

Steven P. Lewis
Rebecca Matthew
Patricia Moore
Lance Palmer
Sarah Shannon

2020-2021

Joseph Goetz
John Mativo
Lori A. Ringhand
Jo Smith
Zachary Wood

2019-2020

Nick Fuhrman
John Knox
Puliyur MohanKumar
Richard Morrison
Andrew Owsiak

2018-2019

Lonnie T. Brown Jr.
George Contini
Gary T. Green
Ronald B. Pegg
Shelley E. Zuraw

2017-2018

Santanu Chatterjee
Michael Marshall
Patricia Richards

2016-2017

John Maerz
Annette Poulsen
Markus Crepaz
Karen Miller Russell
James (Jeb) Byers

2015-2016

Timothy L. Foutz
Stephanie Jones
Karen Whitehill King
Rodney Mauricio
Timothey J. Smalley

2014-2015

Malcolm Adams
Mark Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Cynthia Ward

2013-2014

James F. Hamilton
Audrey A. Haynes
David B. Mustard

2012-2013

Peggy Brickman
Marisa Anne Pagnattaro

2011-2012

Jeffrey Berejikian
William Finlay
Jean Martin-Williams
James N. Moore

2010-2011

Sybilla Beckmann Kazez
Jody Clay-Warner
Karen Cornell
Christy Desmet
Wan-I Oliver Li

2009-2010

Carolina Acosta-Alzuru
Allan M. Armitage
Tina M. Harris
Juanita Johnson-Bailey
Naomi J. Norman

2008-2009

Charles Atwood
Mark Compton
Michael Wetzstein

2007-2008

Christopher Allen
James Coverdill
Catherine M. Jones
Lynne Sallot

2006-2007

Ronald Ellington
Michael A. Tarrant
David S. Williams

2005-2006

K. Paige Carmichael
Karl E. Espelie
Edward C. Halper
Robert L. Shewfelt
Janice Simon

2004-2005

E.M. Beck
Charles Bullock III
Marcus Fechheimer
Carole Henry
Tricia Lootens

2003-2004

Corrie C. Brown
David Hazinski
John Maltese
Richard Neupert
Scott Shaw

2002-2003

Scott A. Brown
Marshall Darley
James W. Porter
Frances N. Teague
Cynthia Trim

2001-2002

Ronald L. Bogue
Jeffry M. Netter

2000-2001

Edward A. Azoff
Michael A. Dirr
Jere W. Morehead
Thomas Purinton

1999-2000

Frank R. Harrison III
Linda Medleau
Robert J. Warren
Rebecca H. White

1998-1999

James C. Anderson Jr.
Michelle Henry Barton
Dean G. Rojek
Anne L. Sweaney

1997-1998

Jeanne A. Barsanti
Dan T. Coenen
Shawn M. Glynn
John G. Hollingsworth
Judith C. Reiff

1996-1997

Thomas W. Ganschow
Hubert H. McAlexander
Theodore Shifrin
Frederick J. Stephenson
Katharina M. Wilson

1995-1996

Ileana Arias
Lee Reed Jr.
Keith J. Karnok

1994-1995

Cal M. Logue
Brenda H. Manning
Charles W. Mims

1993-1994

William Barstow
Craig Greene
Charles Hudson
Robert Matthews
Genelle Morain

1992-1993

Robert D. Clements
Alan J. Jaworski
States McCarter
William G. Provost
Peter J. Shedd

1991-1992

Charles D. DeLorme
Egbert M. Ennulat
Conrad C. Fink
Robert S. Lowery
Carmen Chaves Tesser

1990-1991

Joseph R. Berrigan Jr.
Henry Edwards Jr.
Annie K. Prestwood
Betty J. Whitten

1989-1990

Wayne A. Crowell
Larry L. Hatfield
Sharon J. Price
David R. Shaffer
Susette M. Talarico

1988-1989

Josef M. Broder
Ronald L. Carlson
Lief H. Carter
Robert Nix
Susan L. White

1987-1988

Loch K. Johnson
Frederick J. Stephenson

1986-1987

Richard K. Hill
D. Keith Osborn

1985-1986

Joseph R. Berrigan Jr.
Susette M. Talarico

1984-1985

John D. Hatfield
David E. Tyler

1983-1984

Lief H. Carter
James C. Walters

1982-1983

Wayne A. Crowell
John T. Granrose

1981-1982

Michelle Sarkees
Betty J. Whitten

Commit to academic excellence

Leave a Gift